Christian Pregnancy Crisis Clinics Exposed
Posted on November 6, 2011 | 25 Comments
Baby Videos of The pro-choice classification NARAL did a year-long review in to ‘pregnancy predicament clinics’ as well as unclosed how these clinics try to shock (with misinformation) as well as shame women in to not carrying an abortion. They additionally try to modify them to Christianity. Ana Kasparian as well as Cenk Uygur plead upon The Young Turks. www.charlotteobserver.com The Young Turks upon Current TV: current.com The Largest Online New Show in a World. Google+: www.gplus.to Facebook: www.facebook.com Twitter: twitter.com Support TYT for FREE: bit.ly
Comments (25)
Abortion is murder seriously if you didn’t want the baby in the first place don’t open your legs simple as that and people always say well what about rape? There is a procedure if you go to get your uterine wall scraped. This is different from abortion because abortion is a very far formed baby it can feel and sense what goes on it feels the awful pain of the abortion so if you don’t want the baby keep your legs closed til your sure
@360Corentin
Pregnancy is COMPLETELY different.Only people with vaginas and uteruses can get pregnant.(providing they are fertile)Here’s an idea, when you get ‘married’ by the state,that’s a ‘civil union’ once you get married by the church,that’s a marriage.This way the anti-gay churches can be exclusionary and the gays can be recognized as a couple by the state and get the rights that come with a union.If you deny marriage to gays you’re denying them 1,138 rights.Sounds wrong to me.
@Kitsune1414 The definiton of marriage is a problem. I define marriage as between one man and one woman, and so, its only applicable to heterosexuals. To me, its the same thing as pregnancy being only for women. It simply doesn’t apply to the other people.
@360Corentin
I am extremely open minded.I think you should have every freedom that does not involve the intentional non-consensual harm of another human being or animal.But, it is a fact that god killed,tortured,and commanded the killing and torture of others.Sounds evil to me.The definition of god is simply’the one Supreme Being,the creator and ruler of the universe.’Nothing about being good.
Also,marriage is a human right,NOT a heterosexual privilege.That’s a right you’re denying them.
@Kitsune1414 First of all: Fact and opinion? wow….somebody isn’t open to new ideas. Also, the definition of God is good, so…
Secondly, I don’t believe that gays shouldn’t have rights. I believe that they should have rights, but marriage is between a man and a woman. That’s what I believe.
@360Corentin
I’m just trying to point out the fact god is evil like you tried to point out the opinion he is good.
And why would two people who can’t pro-create be together? You can ask that to an infertile couple, one reason, love. That’s why. Being gay is very natural almost every animal in the world is gay why are humans any different? You’re like a racist saying ‘I don’t hate blacks. I have several black friends! I just don’t think they should have any rights.’
@Kitsune1414 Like I said, dude, I disagree with you. You are not taking any sort of cultural differences into account. Also, I personally believe that homosexuality isn’t a natural state. If you think about it, why would it be natural for two people who cannot procreate to be together? It makes no sense. And, before anybody yells at me, I do not hate gay people, I actually have several gay friends, and even though I think this, we are friends, and I consider them to be nice people.
@360Corentin
How can you disagree with that? It’s fact, god punishes victims. Who else would call for the death of a rape victim? (even worse than that he says either death OR marrying the man who raped her and she has to be sexually submissive) Who else would condone slavery because they aren’t Israelites? Who else would convict two men to death just because they love each other? Who else would kill babies because of slavery? (which he supports!)
Answer: God.
@Kitsune1414 Well, I disagree with you, but I think we need to agree to disagree.
@360Corentin
It’s not hard to understand at all. God wants a cult and we are to be his followers and do everything he tells us without question. If we question him we’ll see the lies and contradictions. And if we question him he’ll send us to burn and roast for all time.
@metalsusa1 Those are some very good arguments. Thanks for being so articulate.
@Kitsune1414 To be honest, it is hard to understand the punishments in the old testement, but what I’ve said before: God’s justice is absolute. To God, the Bible teaches, all sin is equal. And :”The wages of sin is death.” However, Jesus paid the price,and freed us from our punishment.
@canuckartist Thanks, that was an interesting and well-thought out opinion. Also, I totally agree with you. Abortion is an very emotional issue.
Abortion forever, fuck christians
@360Corentin Magically design to come out in that order, it just did.
A royal flush is “ACE, KING, QUEEN, JACK, TEN,” of the same suit. To be dealt a royal flush is something like 60 million to 1 odds.
But so is any other combination of 5 cards. The point is it matters more with the royal flush because of the meaning we put behind it.
The design argument of the precision of the universe only matters because of the meaning we give it, if we weren’t here it wouldn’t matter.
@360Corentin I see you use the design theory of creation. As I’ve explained in the past when this comes up, you can’t look backwards several billion years from the present day and say “look, it’s obvious it was planned and designed for a purpose”.
Take a deck of cards and shuffle them up real well, lay the cards down one by one, all 52 cards showing. Write down the order they were laid down. How long do you think it would take to duplicate that order?
It doesn’t mean it was (cont’)
@360Corentin That’s funny you would use horses as an example of things popping into existence. Of course the answer is EVOLUTION. The horse as well as whales are just two excellent examples of an almost complete fossil record of animals living 10′s of millions of years ago leading to the present day horse and whale.
Science can’t use supernatural claims for two reasons 1) there not testable 2)there not falsifiable. Science is not trying to explain away creationism. It’s apples and oranges.
@360Corentin The Big Bang Theory is the best current explanation for the expansion of the universe (Not a fact). The starting of the Big Bang is a far cry from the God of the bible.
You use the term symbolic to describe Genesis. Would that include the story of Adam and Eve? and how do I tell the difference?
For obvious reasons if Adam and Eve didn’t exist historically as described in the bible there’s a huge problem with a need for atonement.
@360Corentin This is a complex and emotional issue and all I can do is state my opinion. I believe the fetus is human tissue from the conception, but only a person once “personality” is evident. That would be well after birth, once the child begins to understand something of it’s surroundings, recognises itself in a mirror, recognises words and such… From birth, it’s a human baby and precious beyond measure, but not a person until personality is developed. see “theory of mind”
@360Corentin
The Pagan Ancient Greeks were also pretty consistent.The Bible allows torture, maybe that’s why they got the same punishment,Yahweh was like ‘Torture them for any reason! Hell! Stone that poor raped teenager to death because she didn’t cry out! Make your wife drink that abortion potion because you think she cheated!’ If he were real, God seems kind of bloodthirsty to me.
@Kitsune1414 The Bible was written by over 40 authors, over a time span of thousands of years. Even if you look at the books which did not make it into the Bible we use today, there is still a common theme carried between all of these books. 40 people, thousands of years, some of the authors put to torture because of their writings. And yet, not one recanted. All of them agreed. This is a history unmatched by any other book which has ever existed.
@360Corentin
Reliability of religious texts? What about The Baecchea by Euripides? The Iliad,Odyssey and Homeric Hymn to Demeter by Homer?The Hymns of Orpheus?Are these less reliable because they are of other gods?These were written by real flesh and blood humans Matthew,Mark,Luke,and John were not. The books of the Bible were voted on by a committee of men. Revelation barely made it in because it was considered ‘uninspired’.
I am not able to answer your questions, Darwin and Hawking are.
@360Corentin Oh, I didn’t see the correction. Jolly good.
@Kitsune1414 (cont.) where did the Big Bang come from? How did everything get so perfectly set up for life on Earth. How did life forms evolve so perfectly, with almost no mistakes or mistarts in the fossil record, as the theory of evolution would suggest there should be? How did life come from nonlife? incedently, hundreds of years ago, by proving that maggots came from eggs instead of appearing, sceintists rejected the theory of life from non-life. Why, then, do they continue to use it?
@Kitsune1414 I’m glad you made that point, because the way we can feel God is similar. We can feel him in action, see the marks of his work. The fact that I believe in Yahweh is a different matter. It has to do more with the reliability of religous texts, and my own personal experiences, rather than science, and it’s a very long and complicated thing. I’m just trying with you, to get you to acknowledge at least the possibility of the existence of a God. If Hawking can explain everything,